by Dorothy Kim
Medieval Feminist Wikipedia Write-In (#medievalwiki)
Medieval Feminist Wikipedia Write-In (#medievalwiki)
Call For Volunteers for SMFS Wiki Write In:
The Society for Medieval Feminist Scholarship is thrilled to announce that we
will be running a Wikipedia Write In for the ENTIRE International Congress on Medieval Studies in Kalamazoo (May 8-11)!
Tired of having your students cite bad information from Wikipedia? Unfortunately, railing against Wikipedia is useless -- it has become the go-to first search for most people, even scholars. Writing your own articles and editing those of others is the best way to get feminist scholarship mainstreamed. Just as with print encyclopedias, women scholars do not write and edit enough articles on this digital medium. SMFS is sponsoring a Wikipedia-Write-In in Fetzer 1060 that will be open during conference hours every day (see below). We will run short tutorials every hour. Dorothy Kim and Mary Suydam are spearheading this effort. We need volunteers to staff this enterprise. If you haven't written a Wikipedia article it is very easy to learn. Either your college libary staff can teach you or you can learn it using the script put together by Mary and Dorothy for the conference. This script will be provided to every volunteer. Please volunteer! Contact Mary Suydam (suydam@kenyon.edu) with your name, email, and shift times you are available (Conference sessions are now available online at http://www.wmich.edu/medieval/congress/sessions.html. We look forward to hearing from you!
Tired of having your students cite bad information from Wikipedia? Unfortunately, railing against Wikipedia is useless -- it has become the go-to first search for most people, even scholars. Writing your own articles and editing those of others is the best way to get feminist scholarship mainstreamed. Just as with print encyclopedias, women scholars do not write and edit enough articles on this digital medium. SMFS is sponsoring a Wikipedia-Write-In in Fetzer 1060 that will be open during conference hours every day (see below). We will run short tutorials every hour. Dorothy Kim and Mary Suydam are spearheading this effort. We need volunteers to staff this enterprise. If you haven't written a Wikipedia article it is very easy to learn. Either your college libary staff can teach you or you can learn it using the script put together by Mary and Dorothy for the conference. This script will be provided to every volunteer. Please volunteer! Contact Mary Suydam (suydam@kenyon.edu) with your name, email, and shift times you are available (Conference sessions are now available online at http://www.wmich.edu/medieval/congress/sessions.html. We look forward to hearing from you!
Please volunteer! Contact Mary
Suydam (suydam@kenyon.edu)
with your name, email, and shift times you are available Conference sessions
are now available online at http://www.wmich.edu/medieval/congress/sessions.html.
In Memoriam: Adrianne Wadewitz (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wadewitz).
Originally, I thought
I would write this post about the Medieval Feminist Wikipedia Write-In at
Kalamazoo this year about Isidore of Seville. I mean, what a perfect topic,
right, he’s the patron saint of the internet. He happens also to have assembled
a tremendously important foundational text—Etymologies—the
origins of the medieval encyclopedic genre. I could have had fun thinking about
Isidore of Seville MSS (I am particularly obsessed with the bestiary entries)
and the constant revision and reassembling of encyclopedic knowledge. But
instead, I would like to dedicate this blog and what will happen at Kalamazoo
in a 4-day marathon to Adrianne Wadewitz, who died at the end of March from a
climbing accident in Joshua Tree.
Adrianne
Wadewitz was a Mellon Digital Scholarship Postdoctoral Fellow at Occidental
College. A Ph.D. in 18th c. English Literature from Indiana
University, she was also known in digital humanities as the go-to person for
all things Wikipedia. She had begun writing entries in 2004 and had contributed
to 49,000 Wikipedia entries and was ranked 813 of all Wikipedia editors. I
actually met Adrianne only once in person at MLA (in the Marriott lobby bar) in
Chicago. We had talked vis-à-vis twitter numerous times when I was in the
process of organizing this unusual media session for SMFS. After I got approval
to pitch the idea of a Medieval Feminist Wikipedia Write-In (by democratic vote
at our Business Meeting at Kalamazoo 2013), I needed crowdsourced help from the
feminist digital humanists in order to figure out what I was getting myself
into and what I needed in order to pull it off.
So,
I contacted vis-à-vis twitter (yes, everyone, twitter is a fantastic networking
tool) and reached out to #dhpoco (Adeline Koh and Roopika Risam) who had
recently done a Global Feminist Wikipedia Write-In; Jacqueline Wernimont
(Scripps) who I knew had done feminist Wikipedia Write-Ins. All roads led to
Adrianne, because as everyone said, Adrianne is the woman to talk to for
Wikipedia write-a-thons as feminist activist acts as well as for practical
advice. She was generous with her suggestions and links and what was necessary
to pull off such an event. There is simply no way this event would be happening
without the generosity of her and other feminist digital humanists who have
given me advice, suggestions, or even written a how-to guide in the Chronicle’s ProfHacker. Her work, her
generosity, her humor, and her dedication will be sorely missed.
Academic
Citation and Gender
Wikipedia
has a major gender imbalance issue in relation to its editorial demographics.
As the recent Wikimedia discussion has stated, the numbers reveal that less
then 10% of Wikipedia editors are women. In addition, in so many different
fields, incredibly important named women in history, literature, sciences,
social sciences, culture, art, etc. have no entries whatsoever (http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/to-fix-wikipedia-s-gender-imbalance-a-big-editing-party/280470/).
Adrianne had organized several feminist Wikipedia edit-a-thons (FemTech
Edit-a-thon; Feminists Engage Wikipedia, etc.). She was a major figure in
pushing Wikipedia’s gender issues in producing knowledge. She wrote the gold
standard articles for major entries in 18th-century and Romantic
literature and culture: Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Thoughts on the Education of Daughters, etc.
Why
should a feminist Wikipedia-Write-In-Marathon be an important part of your
Kalamazoo conference experience? I would direct everyone to what we know about
the state of women and citation documented in several CHE articles. Women are cited less than men and women writers actually
tend not to cite their own work as these articles explain: http://chronicle.com/article/New-Data-Show-Articles-by/143559/;
http://chronicle.com/article/New-Gender-Gap-in-Scholarship/145311/.
Sara Ahmed tackles this problem in feminist theory and names it “The Problem of
Perception.” She uses the following example to discuss “when you expose a problem you pose a problem.” She writes: “For example, when you make an observation in public
that all the speakers for an event are all white men, or all but one, or all
the citations in an academic paper are to all white men, or all but a few,
these observations are often treated as the problem with how you are perceiving
things (you must be perceiving things!).” She is speaking to issues related to
gender and racial diversity in this excellent post: http://feministkilljoys.com/2014/02/17/the-problem-of-perception/.
I encourage everyone, especially with feminist tendencies, to read. Her work
here is especially important in considering the issues surrounding gender
diversity and the question of citation. While further chronicling this
problematic terrain of academic citation, she directs us to these examples:
“Or
once I pointed out that a reference list of a book included almost only male
writers (and two of the references to women were references to women in
relation to men) and the author responded that I had described the pattern
right, as the pattern was ‘in the traditions’ that influenced him. Or when I
had a conversation with someone on Facebook about the masculinist nature of a
certain field of philosophy, they responded with a ‘well of course,’ as if it
to say, well of course it is like that,
it is the philosophy of technology. I have begun calling these kinds of
arguments disciplinary fatalism: the assumption that in following a line we can
only reproduce that line.”
In order to
disrupt these tendencies of gendered citation and credit, this edit-a-thon has
been created to make a “conscious willed effort” to change this by asking
everyone, but particularly women medievalists, to come and edit entries with
us. If we want genealogies of knowledge to stop replicating masculine, citational
tendencies, then we must take up our laptops and push back by writing entries
and changing the demographics of citation.
We
will also have both the Facebook SMFS page and the twitter feed (@SocietyMedFem)
open to help answer questions to those interested but who cannot attend the
conference. Post a question on the Facebook page or tweet it to us between our
opening hours. If medievalists are interested in changing the perception of the
Middle Ages for public users (students, general public, etc.), this Wikipedia
Write-In is an opportunity to change that terrain. We will be tweeting how it’s
going at this hashtag: #medievalwiki. Please feel free to post how writing
these entries are going. Our conference registration will allow us access to
WMU’s digital library of articles and sources. Thus, bring yourselves and your
laptops to Fetzer.
We
will be doing a series of blog posts for In
the Middle that will explains some of the basics and a how-to guideline on
how to write an entry. We hope to see you at Kalamazoo in person or online. We
hope this experience will inspire future assignments with your students or
future edit-thon events on your campuses.
Dorothy Kim
Assistant
Professor of English, Vassar College
@dorothyk98
“medievalist,
digital humanist, feminist”
No comments:
Post a Comment